Posts by Gino Sassani

"How much do you know about the family business?"

Well, for over 20 years, the family business over at CBS has been the NCIS franchise, and another decade longer if you consider it was a spin-off of JAG, which lasted 10 years on its own. It's been a busy 20 years, I can tell you that. About seven years into the original show's run, we got our first NCIS spin-off with NCIS: Los Angeles. That show focused more on action and a lot of explosions. The show just finished its final year after 14 seasons. Then there was NCIS: New Orleans that brought the focus to the unique culture and tastes of The Big Easy. It lasted seven years, and there's an upcoming NCIS: Sydney which is about to take us down under to grab that shrimp on the barbie. Things continue to expand, and now we have NCIS: Hawai'i, which expands the franchise and solves a situation at CBS. For decades they have kept a Hawaiian studio on the islands. First it was a remake of Hawaii Five-O, and then a remake of Magnum P.I. recreated history just as it happened in the 1970's. Now Magnum is gone once again, and so CBS slid a new NCIS show right into those production facilities. What we have is another unique location and another NCIS crew out there solving Navy crimes.

"Jack, we have done our jobs and done them well. This fight was passed down to us and will continue with or without us. But we will always be better than the institutions we serve, and that is what matters when it matters most. There are no heroes in our profession. But occasionally there are good men. Men who act on what is right, not simply doing what they are told to do. I have not always lived my life with honor. But perhaps I have done enough to die with it. I hope the same for you." 

Witness the birth of -- actually make that rebirth of --one of the most popular action heroes in literature. Tom Clancy’s Jack Ryan has been a character of many jobs and many faces over the years. Baldwin, Ford, Pine, and Affleck have all stepped into the role of the man who has been a soldier, an analyst, an operative, and a president. What might appear as a clear advantage for this Amazon Prime streaming television show can be just as much a liability. When you throw in the Tom Clancy novels, comic books, and fan fiction, there is a ton of Jack Ryan history that pretty much gives us a story arc from his humble beginnings to extraordinary exploits, and wearing the faces of a few good performers. It's a tall order for the series and perhaps an even taller order for actor John Krasinski, who has created a nice little horror franchise with wife Emily Blunt on the side. I don't really have the time or energy to watch streaming shows and films. There's always a backlog here of discs that need to be watched and reviewed, and I've created a rather comfortable viewing experience with my home theatre I call The Reel World. Our motto: Here there be monsters. So a couple of years ago I had my first experience with this series when Paramount sent the first season on Blu-ray. It was far more of a captivating and compelling series than I expected. Then the second season reached the Blu-ray home platform format, and while I certainly detected a sophomore slump there, there's still enough interesting drama to keep a fan engaged for another year. And what a year it has been. You can find out for yourself with Paramount's release of Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan Season Three on Blu-ray.

"I met him fifteen years ago. I was told there was nothing left. No reason, no conscience, no understanding, even the most rudimentary sense of life or death, good or evil, right or wrong. I met this six-year-old child, with this blank, pale, emotionless face and the blackest eyes ... the devil's eyes. I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up because I realized that what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply ... evil."

Blumhouse and David Gordon Green recently finished a sequel/reboot of John Carpenter's Halloween with mixed results. He got Jamie Lee Curtis to return for all three films in the trilogy. Most of the various sequels and reboots did not include the original film's star, but Green was not the first one to get her to return to the role of Laurie Strode. To celebrate the 20th anniversary of the first film, Curtis returned to the role in the somewhat neglected. It was the seventh overall film in the franchise, and like the recent trilogy, it erased all of the various sequels and claimed to be a continuation of the original film. It produced a respectable $55 million on a $17 million budget and was the next final film in the series before Rob Zombie did his own reboot of the franchise that lasted for two films and finally led up to the David Gordon Green attempt to revisit and pretty much conclude the franchise with three more films. Curtis returned for Halloween Resurrections, which was a kind of meta/reality show take on the material, but Rob Zombie took it back to the beginning. Is that really the end of Michael Myers and company? I doubt it. There's still bank to be made from the franchise, and after a respectable few years, someone else will tackle the tale. Where they will start from is anyone's guess, but they could do worse than look at Halloween H2O: Twenty Years Later as a jumping-off point. I doubt anything like that is going to happen, but the franchise could certainly do worse,... and it has.

When it comes to watching films at the theater, often I will want to see a movie sometimes three, four weeks into their release.  The crowds have quieted down, and I can often focus on the movie rather than the person next to me who might be munching on their popcorn a little too loudly or on their cell phone.  However, with many films not sticking around as they should, it can often be difficult to make that work.  This past Sunday, I was fortunate enough to see A Haunting In Venice, a film that opened in mid-September to honestly rather tepid box office earnings.  I had seen Murder on the Orient Express on 4K disc and Death on the Nile with my wife in theaters, so I certainly wanted to see the third film in the Kenneth Branagh's version of Hercule Poirot.  So quality time aside, was this film actually worth our matinee dollar, or was it better spent at the local sandwich shop?  Let's take a look.

The birds are all aflutter this morning.  We happen to be in Venice, Italy, 1947, shortly after the Second World War.  The date: October 31st, Halloween.  The date is however unbeknown to Hercule Poirot (played by Kenneth Branagh), who has recently retired from his detective work.  He wakes up to the sound of death, a fairly common occurrence from his former line of work.  Instead of investigating dead bodies, he analyzes his plants as well as the mail.  At some point, Hercule decides to venture outside where a mass crowd follows him asking for his advice or how to solve their own murder cases.  He declines them all, and the people who decide to be a little more aggressive are dealt with by Hercule's bodyguard (and retired cop) Vitale Portfoglio (played by Riccardo Scamarcio), who is nearby and watching.

"What do you think evil is? I'll tell you what I think evil is..."

It's sequels/reboots made by filmmakers who haven't got one single clue what made the original such a classic. The Exorcist was a masterpiece of filmmaking and is truly one of the most compelling horror films even 50 years later. There are a lot of reasons for that. Unfortunately, David Gordon Green couldn't name a single one if you gave him a cheat sheet in one hand and William Friedkin's complete notes in the other. Blum House took a huge risk after they finished their Halloween trilogy. The films were hit and miss with some good moments. But most fans of the original never could completely bond with the films. So Blum House decided they liked this 3 film reboot/sequel idea and took a chance on committing $400 million for a trilogy of The Exorcist. Like the Halloween trilogy it would ignore all but the original film and take it's story directly from that moment onward. On paper it's a pretty solid plan. Both Halloween and The Exorcist have been followed by some pretty bad follow-up films and there's no reason to overcomplicate the mythology by bogging yourself down with all the bad that might have followed. The problem is that you must also avoid BEING the bad that follows. With The Exorcist: Believer David Gordon Green now rules the bad that follows The Exorcist. Believe it or not (pun intended), that's the good news. The bad news is no matter how bad this film is received we're going to get two more. It's part of the commitment and both Blum House and audiences everywhere are stuck with it. And while they have to make the films we don't have to pay our 20 bucks to see films. All I can say is Green should be grateful for streaming because it's the only thing he has left after a film that could use a good exorcism of its own.

"My Mamma told me to pick the right one."

In 1982, Cheers first broke on the network sitcom circuit. It was a small Boston bar owned by a has-been baseball player living on the glory years he didn't really have. It was the bar where everyone knows your name. Behind the bar there was Woody. Woody was pretty much a kid who looked up to the owner in an almost hero-like way. He was naive and was easily and often taken for a rube. But he was kind, and no matter how out of it he might be, there wasn't an evil bone in that character's body. It was all an act. Of course, it was a television show where Woody was played by Woody Harrelson. For crying out loud, even their first names were the same. It wasn't hard for us to believe the two Woodys were one and the same. I know I did. It was an act, sure, but I didn't know it was that good an act. We all found out just how good of an actor Woody Harrelson was when he stripped away kind, innocent Woody the bartender and took on the vicious role of Mickey Knox in in Oliver Stone's brutal film Natural Born Killers. Later we found out that the actor's father was a convicted hitman for the mob and was busted trying to take out a judge. Today Harrelson has proven his awesome range over and over again in dozens of impressive performances. But in 1994, I wasn't prepared for Natural Born Killers or Mickey Knox, and so it's a film that has remained seared in my brain since that day.

"Here comes Gordy."

In the 1950's Gordon McLendon owned a series of radio stations throughout Texas along with a string of drive-in movie locations. Those drive-ins needed films to draw crowds, and Gordy wasn't happy with the cost of some of the distribution deals that came to him. So he decided to team up with a couple of guys and try his hand at making his own movies. The first guy he teamed with would become well known to television audiences, but not for the movies he helped produce with Gordy. Ken Curtis would become the beloved Gunsmoke character Festus, a deputy who had more in common with Don Knotts than Marshal Dillon. He may not have been the sharpest point on a tin star, but America loved him. They might have thought twice if they knew about this partnership. The third leg of this tripod was Gordy’s father, B.R. McLendon. Together they would make Hollywood history, or is that Hollywood infamy? That's for you to decide. They made three movies in total, but the first two are where that history was made.

"That's the most important thing. Just have fun."

You shouldn't need a primer on the NCIS franchise by now. Unless you've been living under a rock for the last decade or longer, you're up to speed on these guys. If not, you still could have some fun and enjoy the CBS DVD release of NCIS: L.A., but NCIS has been around for over 20 years, and this particular version has been around for 14 seasons now. That's a lot of characterizations under the bridge and a ton of character evolution and stories that can't help but give you maximum mileage out of the release. If you aren't up to speed, you can check out over 30 seasons of various NCIS reviews by just banging it here: NCIS Reviews. That should keep you busy long enough to get you to the point that we're here talking about Season 13. So hopefully you are up to speed, and we can get on with it. Shall we?

"Have you ever heard of exorcism? It's a stylized ritual in which rabbis or priests try to drive out the so-called invading spirit. It's pretty much discarded these days, except by the Catholics who keep it in the closet as a sort of embarrassment. It has worked, in fact, although not for the reason they think, of course. It was purely the force of suggestion. The victim's belief in possession helped cause it. And just in the same way, this belief in the power of exorcism can make it disappear." 

By now we've all heard of The Exorcist. The film was based on a best-selling novel by William Peter Blatty. Blatty himself based the story on a real exorcism of a young boy many years earlier. And that's where the true power of the film begins. The monsters of horror movies often allow us a sense of unreality that protects our inner selves from being truly terrified. Yes, they may frighten us, but it's fun to be frightened, isn't it? It's rare that a horror film touches on something inside of us and delivers an experience that is truly terrifying. It's arguable that The Exorcist has done this in a way that has rarely, if ever, been repeated in horror movie history. Whatever your religious beliefs might be, there is that little voice deep in our minds that fears what we call evil and can't deal with the possibility that we can be taken over by such evil. Devil. Demon. Mental illness. It doesn't matter. We're all afraid of losing control of who we are to some invading force within our minds. Within our very souls.

The first Paw Patrol movie opened up in August of 2021 during the pandemic era where barely anyone wanted to go anywhere that wasn't a grocery store (because somehow that was safe).  It still managed to pull in forty million domestic and another hundred million internationally.  With the built in audience from the television series, a sequel was almost a no-brainer.  I remember taking my family to go see the first Paw Patrol (the theater was quite bare) and actually enjoying it quite a bit.  It certainly helped to bring all of the key elements from the television series and produce something that wasn't nauseating and over-the-top.  However, sequels of movies based on popular properties often go the wrong direction.  Let's see what the Mighty Pups have in store for us in their second outing.

As is the case with many Nickelodeon films, we get a cartoon short to start off the show.  This one has Dora the Explorer, who is apparently getting a new CGI series in 2024.  This short is entitled Dora and the Fantastical Creatures.  Dora (voiced by Diana Zermeno) and her companion, Boots (voiced by Asher Spence) the monkey are going on an adventure to the land of Alebrijes, where they have the most colorful and magical creatures in the rain forest.  It appears that someone has taken the glowey.  We later find out that it was Swiper (voiced by Marc Weiner).  Swiper is taken down by making him realize that he did a bad thing, and he gives back the glowey.  So it's a totally realistic cartoon.  Much eye-rolling did occur, and I realized that I'm glad that my son never picked up on this show.  However, he might have momentarily picked up the phrase, "Swiper, no swiping."  Curses!  Let's get on to the feature presentation.