Disc Reviews

“You should be so proud of her.”

Shelby Oaks is something special when you look at it objectively; it’s a film that was crowd funded by the YouTuber Chris Stuckmann, who wanted to take a shot at making a movie of his very own. The original goal was to raise $600,000, but by the time his Kickstarter was closed, he was able to raise over 1.4 million to make his film. Before he’d even begun filming, this is already an impressive achievement considering how many established filmmakers struggle to get funds together to make their own films. For Shelby Oaks, over 14,000 people contributed to funding the dream for this directorial debut, so again, in my book Chris Stuckmann already won for being able to pull this off. Now the film has a producing credit from Mike Flanagam attached as an executive producer and Neon in charge of the films distribution … so needless to say, there is a great deal of hype around this film. Two films immediately come to mind when I think about this kind of hype before a film even reaches audiences, The Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity … both films that innovated the found-footage genre but also had some clever marketing once acquired for distribution.  Does Shelby Oaks live up to the hype? Well, from my experience, this is a pretty divisive film.

In the 1930’s and 40’s, MGM was trying to get in on the lucrative animation game. The field was dominated at the time by Warner Brothers with their Loony Tunes shorts, and of course, the iconic cast of animated characters coming out of the Walt Disney Studio. For years they had failed to find the right property to take advantage of the market. It wasn’t until the team of William Hanna and Joseph Barbera approached the studio with their first project that the times did change, at least a little, for the fledgling animation department at MGM. The project was far from an original one even for the time. It was a very basic cat-and-mouse adventure featuring a cat named Tom and a mouse named Jerry. There would be almost no dialog on the shorts. It certainly didn’t look like much of a hit to the studio brass, but with no better ideas on the way, they went ahead with the new shorts of Tom And Jerry. There’s a reason why the cat-and-mouse pair is such a classic. It’s because it works. If you can make your characters entertaining and endearing enough, you can have a hit. MGM finally entered the major leagues, and the team of Hanna and Barbera would become one of the most successful animation teams in history. They would go on to create such cherished characters as The Flintstones, Yogi Bear, The Jetsons, and, of course, Scooby Doo.

These were the days of the Golden Age in Hollywood. These shorts were not being produced for television, which hadn’t been invented when they began; rather, they were intended for theater-goers. In those days, going to the movies was much more of an inclusive experience. You always got a cartoon short along with an adventure serial, the likes of Buck Rogers, Flash Gordon, and The Lone Ranger. These multi-chaptered serials were the forerunners to the modern television series. It kept you coming back to the movies to see what would happen next. Each chapter ended in a cliffhanger. These early serials were the inspiration for such film franchises as Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Finally you got one, sometimes two movies, all for the price of a single admission.

"They're not above nipping at you. Wildfires are pushing coyotes deeper into Los Angeles neighborhoods. They're desperate. They're going to do what they have to to survive." 

I think it started with Jaws in 1975. People were afraid to go into the water; some still are. It started with sharks, but by the end of the 1970's it was killer bees, ants, bears ... and by the turn of the century there were giant killer snakes and bears high on cocaine. The wave continues this year with Coyotes, directed by Colin Minihan. The film is at times clever, but it moves into the territory of a comic book movie by using crazy comic frames to introduce characters, and while we're talking about sharks, this movie is jumping them in the first 10 minutes as we watch a young spoiled rich girl walking her yip-yip dog. The next thing we know she's reeling in 15-feet of leash and a bloody foofoo collar at the end. The stage is set. It's a bit amusing, but scared? Not this one. Instead we have CGI coyotes that look like something out of a ... that's right. Comic book.

“Do you know why people break up? Guilt. But if you make the bad thing okay, there is no guilt.”

Boy, was this messy. This was possibly the messiest love affair I ever witnessed, which somehow managed to make me laugh, yet also had me rolling my eyes at times. When good-natured Carey’s wife, Ashley, tells him she wants a divorce, his world is shattered. Seeking support from his friends, Julie and Paul, Carey discovers the secret to their happiness: an open marriage. Well, you can guess what transpires next. Essentially, the two couples’ friendship erupts into conflict when the husband of a divorcing couple sleeps with the wife of an open marriage couple. Frequent collaborators Michael Angelo Covino and Kyle Marvin star in the film, which they cowrote together, joining forces with Dakota Johnson and Adria Arjona as their respective significant others. So, to put it simply, in this comedy, both guys are punching above their weight.

"Plato wrote that the ancient Greeks believed we were created with four arms, four legs, and a head with two faces. but Zeus feared our power so he split us into two separate parts, dooming us to spend our lives in search of the other half." 

What's in a name? Let me tell you, Billy. When I was first offered the opportunity to watch and review Together out on Blu-ray from NEON, I nearly passed. I saw that it was directed by a Michael Shanks, and I had met Shanks a few years ago. I honestly found him to be one of the biggest idiots I've ever had the displeasure of meeting in the business. Fortunately, I took a closer look at the thing, and I'm glad that I did. You see, this Michael Shanks is not the idiot I met years ago. Of course, that guy was the Stargate SG-1 actor, and this guy is much younger and now a first-time director, and not a complete idiot after all. So I could watch the film minus the bias I would have had a hard time ignoring if it had been that guy. So I took the opportunity, and I'm happy that I did, because while nothing close to a classic or masterpiece, Together is a rather fresh look for a horror film and first effort for the director.