Most anime fans, particularly those in the west, would probably consider Cowboy Bebop one of the greatest series of all time.  Before it got bastardized in a clueless live-action remake, it was a wonderful story of a bounty hunter crew down on their luck who never made any money but always had one hell of an adventure.  Set to some wonderful jazz numbers.  So naturally, when I heard about a new anime movie about an once powerful god who is now down on his luck as a penniless bounty hunter, my curiosity was certainly piqued.  Let's check out New Gods: Yang Jian.

Oh boy, we start off with some narration.  Let's see ... a long long time ago, a calamity (wait, I have to look this one up; OK, got it) broke out between Heaven and Earth.  Life hung in the balance (woah, heavy), and there was violence and destruction.  Forces of Shang and Zhou fought for supremacy.  Humans and Gods united in order to stand tall against opposing forces.  After the battles ended, they went back to their respective realms.  And the world was at peace.  (Awwww.)

" Some call me the Dark One. Others, the Lord of Death. To most, I am... Dracula!"

After nearly 90 years, the Universal horror cycle stands as one of the most enduring collection of horror movies today. Their influence on modern horror is unmistakable. There have been literally thousands of incarnations of Dracula, The Wolf Man, and Frankenstein's monster, but the first image that comes to your mind will always be the nightmare creations of those Universal films. Studio head Carl Laemmle, Jr. was trying to break away from his father's control and create a studio culture of his own. The results would start in 1931 when an unknown Hungarian actor named Bela Lugosi jumped from the stage to the screen in Dracula, directed by Tod Browning. Laemmle's niece, Carla Laemmle, is the girl in the coach headed for Borgo Pass as the film opens to the musical strains from Swan Lake. She is reading a travel brochure about vampires and thus speaks the very first lines ever spoken in a horror film in the era of sound. Lugosi was mesmerizing, and the film was a hit. There was a depression on, but that didn't stop crowds from lining up around theater blocks to be hypnotized by Lugosi's Dracula. The cycle of horror films that followed literally saved the studio from bankruptcy by the time it had all come to an end and the horror baton was passed along to England's House Of Hammer. Since then Universal hasn't really known exactly what to do with these prize IP's.

I usually don’t say this about a movie, as they are my passion, but this film was unwatchable. I usually don’t take this stance, as I generally believe that every movie has something to offer, but in the case of The Weapon, this was not a movie that I enjoyed. It was a movie that I endured. This took me by surprise, as I was expecting to be moderately entertained given the sheer number of recognizable faces: Cuba Gooding Jr., Bruce Dern, Annalynne McCord, Jack Kesy, and the list goes on. The film even had Richard Grieco, who if I’m being honest, I didn’t recognize until the end credits. However, despite all of this, the film had no real substance, not to mention the cutting between character storylines and time periods, enough to make me want to ask for a roadmap just to keep up. I not sure what the intent was, but I feel safe in saying that this film missed it. Even the action sequences, of which there are many, did not hold my interest. That is saying something, because I love good action film. Unfortunately, that wasn’t what this was.

At its core, I believe that the film was a revenge story. Our protagonist, Dallas, played by the film’s director, Tony Schiena, for reasons that are eventually made clear, is on a solo rampage mission against biker gangs and meth labs. While his motivations do eventually come to light, they aren’t what I would call sufficient for his vendetta. Not to mention, there are also conflicting motivations, as he appears to also have a woman that he genuinely cares for who is mixed up in things as well. This is further complicated by another potential love interest, who sees him like a knight-in-shining-armor type. Dallas seems to be a complex individual, as he clearly does not seem himself as noble or deserving of happiness. Given the ruthlessness that he is capable of, I can see why. This could have played well for the film with some fine tuning. In my opinion, we never get a clear view of Dallas. He is a man of few words, whose past weighs heavily on him, devoted to someone who in my opinion is not worthy of such affection. It’s hard to root for this relationship given the type of person he is trying to protect. She is calculating and willing to do whatever it takes to survive. While her own actions are also explained, once again it was not sufficient. The devotion is clearly one-sided, which in turn takes a character which could have at least been likable and makes him kind of pitiful.

"In 1539 The Knight Templars of Malta paid tribute to Charles V of Spain by sending him a Golden Falcon encrusted from beak to claw with rarest jewels --- but pirates seized the galley carrying this priceless token, and the fate of the Maltese Falcon remains a mystery to this day."

What is not a mystery today is the significant role that The Maltese Falcon has played in cinema history. The film itself was a remake. In fact, it was actually Warner's third attempt to film the Dashiell Hammett novel in a single decade. The first version came in 1931 and starred Ricardo Cortez as Sam Spade. That film also featured Dwight Frye as Wilmer Cook. The film was a moderate success but never really delivered on the potential of the source material. Five years later Warner would attempt a comedy version of the story in Satan Met A Lady. It was a total flop. It would only take another five years before the studio took its third crack at the material. In this case, the third time certainly was a charm.

12 Angry Men is one of those rare films that appears to defy all the Hollywood constants and yet become one of the best films of its kind ever made. The setting is entirely too claustrophobic. With the exception of two bookend scenes, the entire film takes place in the tight quarters of a jury deliberation room. The story had only a couple of years earlier been the subject of a live television drama, so the story was far from a fresh idea. The director was a complete unknown who had not at that point directed a major picture. Enter Henry Fonda, the only member of the cast who was a strong A-list name. He was also the driving force behind getting the film made. He produced the film and was involved with most of the major decisions. With all of these elements going against it, you would expect the film to fail miserably, and that’s exactly what it did. During its premier run, the film only lasted a week and was a complete financial failure. It happens all the time, and we would expect the story to end there, but it didn’t.

Enter the 1970’s. There was a rush of independent television stations that were looking for anything and everything to fill up air time. This constant need for programming meant pretty much any film that could be had cheaply was bought and aired, often for an almost nauseating number of showings. 12 Angry Men was one such film, but something amazing happened. People began to notice just how brilliant the film actually was. By then that first time director, Sidney Lumet, had gone on to rather remarkable success. Films like Fail-Safe, Dog Day Afternoon, Serpico, Murder On The Orient Express, and Network had exposed just how much talent the young man actually had. Suddenly the kid from Philly was hot, and the public became interested in his earliest work. Everyone discovered what Fonda already knew back in 1957: Lumet was a genius. These television airings led to revival screenings at local movie houses, and before the first year of the 1980’s this one-time failed film was an admired classic.

You don’t have to be a sports name to know the name Michael Jordan, and there is a good chance you’ve even heard of the Air Jordan even if you are not a sneakerhead. What is a little surprising is that someone out there believed that the story about how a shoe could change the sports industry and go on to make the Nike company a multi-billion dollar industry could be a movie that people would actually want to go see. Well, that person was screenwriter Alex Convery, who wrote a screenplay that would make it onto the Hollywood Black List (For those that don’t know, The Black List is a list that comes out every year that ranks the top 10 unproduced screenplays.  It’s an elite list to be on, and typically these eventually get turned into films that gain critical acclaim). As it would turn out, Ben Affleck and Matt Damon would get a shot at the script, and after a polish it would become the new film Ben Affleck would direct since the last film he helmed, Live By Night back in 2016. Though Affleck has had a few duds in his career in front of the screen, when it comes to his directing career I feel he’s got a strong record, Gone Baby Gone, The Town, and Argo I feel are each great films. Live By Night was a bit of a misstep, but every director has one miss eventually, so when I saw he was going to be directing Air, though I wasn’t quite excited about the story, I was excited to see that he’d be directing again.  What I didn’t see coming was just how good this film would be, and it is no surprise why Amazon Studios elected to give this film a theatrical run rather than dump it onto its Prime streaming service.

The opening credits of the film do a fantastic job of setting the tone of the film and hitting us with a montage of pop culture events that were taking place in 1984. Then we get to meet Sonny Vaccaro (Matt Damon). He’s an executive with Nike who is pretty much a talent scout for the company. At this point Nike is a bit of a joke in the sports world, with Converse and Adidas leading in shoe sales with big names like Magic Johnson and Larry Bird as the face to their product. The basketball line of shoes is about to be shut down if Nike can’t manage to score big, and it’s up to Sonny to find the perfect athlete to promote their line of shoes and keep them in the shoe game.  In other words, this film is pretty much an underdog story. All the companies are looking to secure this new rookie for the Chicago Bulls, Michael Jordan. Nike just can’t compete with the big names, but Sonny is desperate and feels they can attain greatness if they can somehow manage to court Jordan to sign with them.  Literally that is the plot of this film, and we all know how it is going to end, so what’s the point in watching? It’s really as simple as seeing the men behind the scenes and just how much of a risk they took to make it all happen. Then there is the solid cast, the fantastic script, and the attention to detail that Affleck and his team brought together to create this film.

"You think I know every human being with a mustache wearing an identical outfit with a hat with the letter of his first name on it? Because I don't!" 

That's the big caveat for this review of The Super Mario Bros. Movie. You might be asking yourself a simple question. If I don't know anything about the Nintendo or Super Mario Bros. games and world, will I be able to enjoy this film? The answer is that you will still be able to enjoy it, but you'll walk away feeling like you've been left out of the joke. That's how I felt after the press screening for the film. I got to hear many of my fellow critics talking with great excitement about all of these wonderful Easter eggs and subtle homage moments, and I didn't get a single one. Check that. I did get one of them, and I'll explain that next.

"Him is he who bays and slavers forever outside time and space, who shambled down out of the stars when Earth was new and spawned abominations in the seas and blights upon the land. Woe to man when He comes again. To gaze upon his form is to invite madness. That is why in order to serve Him I chose to make some adjustments. Him, The Lurker is on the threshold, and behold, He is coming..."

The latest release from the Warner Brothers animation team in the world of DC Comics is Batman: Doom That Came To Gotham. This series of animated films is no longer part of any shared universe as the many that came before might have been. At least for now these animated adventures are standalone stories, often with their own atmosphere and universe. That's certainly true of Batman: Doom That Came To Gotham. This is likely the most uniquely-styled entry in the series of animated feature films.

"Space...The Final Frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Its 5-year mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no one has gone before!"

Since the relaunch of Star Trek on television via the Paramount + streaming service, I must admit to being a little underwhelmed. It's truly bad when Alex Kurtzman makes me pine for the days of Rick Berman. There have been some pretty good moments in the various new Trek shows. Picard has shown promise and has improved with a third season that looks very exciting. Lower Decks is just too campy for my tastes, and Discovery has so many ups and downs I feel like I'm on a rollercoaster. So along comes Strange New Worlds, and this is the Star Trek I've been waiting for these last decades.

I don’t believe any of us could have predicted that global phenomenon that the John Wick franchise would become. I mean, on its surface, it’s a movie about man avenging his dog. However, each film has peeled back a layer of the fictional underworld created in the film, drawing us deeper and deeper into this well-crafted universe. In the first film, we were teased about this world’s existence. In the second, we learned about the rules that govern it. In the third, we learned the consequences if you break this world’s rules. And in this likely final installment of the franchise, we see what happens when this world declares war on you. Keanu Reeves reprises this character for the fourth time, doing exactly what he’s done for each installment; literally putting his body on the line to deliver an action-packed and epic performance. Joining him are the Wick universe veterans, Ian McShane, Laurence Fishburne, and most notably the recently departed Mr.Lance Reddick. Rounding out the cast are the Wick universe newcomers, many of whom are action stars in their own right, such as Donnie Yen, Scott Adkins, Hiroyuki Sanada, Shamier Anderson, and Bill Skarsgard. If I can for a moment, I would like to return to the subject of the recently departed Lance Reddick, who had been a part of the franchise from the very beginning. In John Wick Chapter 4 this tragedy came as a complete shock and made his character’s ultimate fate all the more impactful. I’ve been a fan of Mr. Reddick dating all the way back to The Wire, and I followed his extensive career from Fringe to Bosch. I intend to cherish his upcoming posthumous appearance, which include appearing as Zeus on the Disney+ remake of Percy Jackson and the Olympians, the theatrical remake of White Men Can’t Jump, as well as the posthumous release of his reprisal of his Wick character in the continuation film, Ballerina.

Last we saw John Wick, he’d barely survived the betrayal of Winston, the New York Continental’s manager. Taken in by the by the freshly-scarred Bowery King, the two seemed to be hatching a plan to declare war on the High Table, the hierarchy which governs the criminal underworld. As the story picks up, John Wick, newly recovered from his injuries, strikes a massive blow against the High Table, essentially declaring war against them. In response, the Table unleashes a dangerous enemy to kill in the form of senior member Marquis Vincent de Gramont, who essentially scorches earth to kill Wick and anyone helping him. Still excommunicated and with very few friends or resources left, it’s John Wick versus the entire High Table and its limitless resources. Sounds like a fair fight, right?