Box Set

SynopsisFive films here, making a very coherent package.Persona is probably the most famous of the bunch, and is arguably Bergman’s mosticonic film. The images are among the most famous in cinema, though they are slightly moredifficult to take seriously thanks to SCTV’s parody. The plot concerns Liv Ullmann as an actresswho has suddenly fallen silent, and Bibi Andersson as the nurse hired to look after her. In theface of Ullmann’s silence, Andersson talks and talks ...nd talks, and her identity is graduallystolen by Ullmann. But this is really a meditation on the nature of storytelling and filmmaking, asthe startlingly postmodern imagery constantly disrupts the narrative.If Persona can be considered a psychological thriller, then Hour of the Wolf isBergman’s gothic horror film. As Max Von Sydow succumbs to madness, tormented by spirits thatmay be imaginary (or may not), the film is very much in the spirit of the Italian gothic filmsbeing produced at the same time.Shame is Bergman’s take on the horrors of war. Ullmann and Von Sydow are the couple whose lives are destroyed by a conflict they do not understand. These are all dark films, and thisis one of the most uncompromisingly bleak.The Passion of Anna is more personality disintegration, and is the first of this set(chronologically) in colour. I’ll confess that I prefer the luminous black-and-white of the others,but the effect does humanize the movie somewhat. This time around, secrets from the pastdisrupt and destroy the lives of four people, including Kinski and Ullmann.Odd man out in this collection is The Serpent’s Egg. Shot much later (1977,compared to the late 60s for the others), and on a much bigger budget, this is the story ofUllmann and (wait for it) David Carradine encountering the nightmare of rising Nazism in 1920sBerlin. The genre Bergman is playing with here is film noir. Not as highly regarded as the otherfour (which are widely hailed as masterpieces), its inclusion in this set might lead to its re-evaluation.AudioAll the films are mono. There has been no messing around with stereo remixes, which is agood thing. Such treatment would be very inappropriate with these films, which have a verycarefully constructed aural environment. What is even better is the clarity and cleanliness of thesound. There is no hiss at all, and so we have beautifully rendered soundscapes where the totalsilence is as important is crashing cacophony. (Persona is a particularly good example ofthis principle in action.)VideoExcellent picture quality on all the prints. Sven Nykvist’s gorgeous cinematography isbeautifully rendered, and nowhere better than in the black and white films, where the grey tonesare jaw-dropping. The clarity is excellent, the tones luminous. There is no noticeable edgeenhancement (or not much, anyway), and the contrasts are beyond reproach. Now and again,there is a bit of grain, but very little, especially when the vintage of the movies is taken intoaccount. All the features are in their original aspect ratios, all of them in 1.66:1 (except forPersona in 1.33:1).Special FeaturesAll five films come with a commentary track. David Carradine does the honours on TheSerpent’s Egg, and has many behind-the-scenes anecdotes to recount. Bergmanbiographer/film professor Marc Gervais comments on the other four. Though he does sometimeslapse into unhelpful rhetorical questions about what’s on the screen, he is still an interestingspeaker, and provides a real sense of commentary from film to film, and so the set becomes an-in-depth course on Bergman. Gervais also turns up on all the featurettes (about a half-hour each)for each film, and Liv Ullmann is the other constant presence. Gervais goes solo on TheSerpent’s Egg short extra on the film’s relationship with German expressionism and filmnoir, and his recontextualization of the film is most helpful. The films are also accompanied by aphoto gallery and theatrical trailer, while The Passion of Anna has Bergman’s short story(which his uses instead of a screenplay) read by Elliott Gould.There is a sixth disc, and this one provides more general background to Bergman and hisfilmmaking. There are two (rare) interviews with the director: “Intermezzo” (a 40-minutedocumentary from 2002) and “An Interview with Ingmar Bergman” (from 1970). DP SvenNykvist’s contributions to the films can hardly be overstated, and he is given his due with “SvenNykvist: With One Eye He Cries.” “Fårö Island Mystique” explores the island which served assetting for many of Bergman’s films (and was also his home). A special issue of AmericanCinematographer (from April 1972) is reprinted, providing six articles on Bergman. Andthere’s another photo gallery.” The menus have scored main screens, but are otherwisebasic.Closing ThoughtsSome of the most important films from one of cinema’s most important directors.Essential.Special Features List

Angels and demons and monsters, oh my!

Not even the death of Buffy could stop this popular show from coming back for a third season. This time around, Angel must find melodrama in new and interesting places, and luckily for fans of the show, he succeeds admirably. In fact, I feel that the death of Buffy was a good thing, as it forced the writers to push this show into its own territory, and helped to give the whole production a voice and an identity all its own.

James Gurney created a wonderful mythical land to rival Tolkien’s Middle Earth that was populated by stranded travelers and talking dinosaurs. Hallmark finally brought these settings to life on film with their popular mini-series. The ABC series that followed was unfortunately complete with several fatal flaws. The dino f/x were not really as good as we have become used to. The blurs and surreal appearance often takes one out of the experience. The actors used in the mini-series were replaced with virtual unknowns and a noticeable lack of skills. It was obviously a mistake to attempt such an ambitious project for weekly television.

Audio

The best sci-fi show on television keeps getting better. MGM has also shown an attempt to improve the DVD releases with each subsequent season. This was Showtime’s final year of hosting Stargate SG-1. I will be interested to see if the cinematic quality holds up with the release of season 6 which was taken over by the Sci-Fi Channel. The stories are bigger in season 5 and the f/x continue to amaze. With seasons 4 and 5 SG-1 had reached its peak.

Synopsis

Unlike most spinoff series, Frasier may be one of those rare instances where the spinoff was equally if not better than the original series. Much of the writing that made Cheers a phenomenon was continued with Frasier, with the exception that there was a smaller cast of characters and as such the stories became more involved and the characters were allowed to grow. The second season adds a great amount of depth to Frasier, his equally quirky psychiatrist brother Niles, and their gruff but lovable father, Martin. ...uring the second season, Frasier annoys the entire city of Seattle by complaining about the weather, Martin’s favored bar faces the threat of a wrecking ball (which may be the fault of his own 2 sons), Roz gets a new job offer, Niles lusting after Daphne continues, and Frasier once again comes face-to-face with his ex-wife Lilith ruining his island getaway.

During its run, Frasier won several Emmys for best direction, best comedy series and best actor. Watching the second season will remind any viewer why the show was worthy of its high praise. The jokes are fast paced and work well. The writing was very clever, especially the use of Frasier and Nile’s elitist vocabulary which often was used to poke fun at them. Fans of the show quickly grew to love the characters in the first season and the second season allowed the writers the opportunity to really sink their teeth into them and truly produce one of the greatest television shows in history.

I had never seen, or even heard of this show until I received this complete first season to review. I was a little hesitant heading in to my first viewing… especially after seeing that the main characters are played by Luke Perry (of 90210 fame), and Malcolm Jamal Warner (of The Cosby Show fame). But after viewing a couple of episodes, I must confess that I was hooked. Sure, the story is full of holes, and the acting is suspect at times, but the overall show is quite gripping and entertaining.

...

If your only contact with the original series Lost In Space is the episodes available in syndication ala the Sci-Fi channel then you really don’t know Lost In Space. The first season was a lot different than the final two. The most noticeable difference is that the first season is in black and white. The stories are much less schlock and camp. More Star Trek than SpaceBalls. The cheesy rubber monsters are there, but the characters have a harsher edge to them.

As the season progressed through 29 episodes (Can you imagine having a 29 episode season!) the tone of the later series begins to come through. It became obvious by mid-season that the interplay of Will, Dr. Smith, and The Robot were what kept audiences tuning in each week. (A special note to the WB network. They are planning a new Lost In Space series next year which will have no Dr. Smith and maybe no B-9 Robot.) This DVD collection is a wonderful treat for fans who have not had the opportunity to see these episodes uncut for almost 40 years.