Posted in: No Huddle Reviews by Gino Sassani on August 22nd, 2025
"We have sold the last of our herd, keeping only four bulls and 100 heifers. The seeds with which you must rebuild the ranch that trickery and laws drafted by loan sharks have stripped from us. The road to Bozeman is snowed over now, passable only on horseback. Our movement is restricted to the lodge and the pastures around the barn until spring. We dare not kill a beef, so the men hunt. Gone are the great feasts of summer. It is stews and stale bread and bland fuel of substance. Like the bear, we hibernate, impatiently awaiting spring."
It is the second and likely final season for the Yellowstone prequel 1923. I have heard whispers that there will be more, and we might see Harrison Ford and Helen Miren again in a series likely to take place a little later, hence a new name, and focused more on Brandon Sklenar's character Spencer who will, no doubt, be raising the grandfather of Kevin Costner's patriarch character in Yellowstone. In the extras Ford hints pretty strongly by reminding us that Harrison Ford is still alive, as are Helen Mirren and Taylor Sheridan. My sources confirm something is in the works but likely years away, and these two leads are not spring chickens. Paramount has released this second season, avoiding the word "final" in the title on DVD and Blu-ray, and it's another one of those must-haves for your home video collection.
Posted in: Disc Reviews by Brent Lorentson on August 22nd, 2025
It would seem that ever since Hereditary came out in 2018, it kind of paved the way for the new sub-genre of horror, “grief-horror”, basically horror films that delve into the emotional horror of losing loved ones and the reckless attempts people may make to reach out to them in the afterlife. This isn’t subject matter most horror fans enjoy; for me I find an odd sense of comfort with these films. When Talk to Me came out, that film especially struck a nerve with me, and I absolutely loved that film from the first-time Australian filmmakers and brothers Danny and Michael Philippou. Talk To Me managed to bring something new to the supernatural genre, and the grief the main character was going through was very relatable for me, so of course I was going to be a little excited about what this duo would do next (at least before they tackled their sequel to Talk To Me). As it would turn out, I wouldn’t have to wait long for their next film, and Bring Her Back tackles the horror of grief in a manner that has stuck with me.
Bring Her Back wastes little time with setting the tone of the film as we see Andy (Billy Barratt) and his sister Piper (Sora Wong) return home to find their father dead in the shower. To further the trauma for the kids, a social worker intends to separate the siblings. Andy wants to have guardianship of his sister, but because he’s not quite 18, it isn’t allowed. After some desperate pleas by Andy, they allow him to stay at the foster parents’ home on the condition that he behaves himself. The relationship between Andy and Piper is very much the heart of this film. They are step-siblings, and because Piper is blind, Andy has played the role as her guardian for some time even before the passing of their father. The film really does a good job of establishing this bond early on, and it’s necessary, because once they get to the foster parents’ home, things definitely take a turn.
Posted in: No Huddle Reviews by Gino Sassani on August 21st, 2025
"Queen Ginnarra rules the Kingdom of Aberon with an iron fist. To her devout followers, she is the prophet of the abyss, a master of unfathomable power, commanding forces that lie beyond the grasp of mortal understanding. They believe that through evil deeds, they may win her unearthly blessings. She led a rebellion against us and murdered my father. I fled to the deadlands in exile. But there is a truth that chills the blood within my veins. Queen Ginnarra is not only ruler of our kingdom, she is my sister."
Crown Of Shadows sells itself as Game Of Thrones Meets 300. There is a reason even small budget filmmakers want to do something akin to Game Of Thrones. It's been immensely popular and has made a mint for HBO and the author of the books, George RR Martin. But there is also a reason why budget filmmakers should stay away from such material. To do it correctly costs a fortune, and you can't hide cheap computer graphics with such an epic promise. It's almost assuredly going to disappoint, and that's the main story behind Crown Of Shadows.
Posted in: The Reel World by Brent Lorentson on August 14th, 2025
Some people may think I’m crazy, but as a lifelong horror fan, I feel right now we are in the Golden Age of horror cinema. When you look at the box office this year and last, horror has simply been a dominate force, and I’m loving it. What’s even better is that it is new material that is raking in the money rather than seeing tired retreads of IPs that have been exhausted over and over again. Sinners, though it wasn’t my cup of tea, dominated the box office, and even though I’m not the film’s biggest fan, I still like seeing horror rake in the money. I’m loving that we’re getting all kinds of horror lately, where an indie slasher like Terrifier is going to be featured at Halloween Horror Nights, and we’re getting all sorts of experimental horror. For instance, later this year we’ll get Goodboy, a paranormal story told through the perspective of a dog. (Sure, it sounds silly, but I’m all for it.) This brings me to Barbarian. For me this has been my favorite horror film in the past five years, and that’s saying a lot, because there has been A LOT of good horror lately. From the moment I heard about Zach Cregger’s next film, Weapons, it immediately shot to the top of my list of most anticipated films. Now that the film has finally come out, is it worth the wait and the hype that surrounds it?
The setup is relatively simple. One night at 2:17 am, 17 students got out of their beds and ran out of their homes and disappeared. The next morning when the teacher went to her class, only one of her students showed. So what happened to these 17 kids?
Posted in: The Reel World by Dakota Nivens on August 14th, 2025
I originally watched Predator: Killer of Killers (2025) as suggested by my boyfriend, which was released on Hulu in June. To be candid, I stopped following the Predator franchise after its cultural peak with the iconic crossover Aliens versus Predator (2004) and its respective sequel in 2007. Once franchises start to feel more like money grabs, like with the Jurassic World franchise (2015-2025), the magic becomes evanescent, and the cinematic experience is severely diminished for me. That said, this movie is so creatively gory, with such a stellar story, you can’t help but be impressed! This film acts as a standalone animated anthology, which serves as the eighth installment for the franchise, released after Prey (2022) and preceding Badlands (Nov 2025). Both the style of animation and the creative use of vantage points distinguished this production from the rest in the franchise and amazingly keeps you invested in the story, despite it initially seeming disconnected.
The point of the anthology clearly was to connect more warmly with the respective characters, and what they’ve endured to reach the point of rendezvous. Despite its grotesque fight scenes and generally horrific outcomes, you grow to feel compassion for each character, understand their interactions with greater insight, and feel hope for them in moments of despair. Additionally, I loved the nuances in historical timelines featured in each story, with the first set during Viking-era Scandinavia, the second exploring feudal Japan, and the third unfolding during World War II.
Posted in: The Reel World by Jeremy Butler on August 9th, 2025
The simplest way I can think to sum up this movie is as such: If you saw the first film (Freaky Friday), then you have essentially already seen the second film already, Freakier Friday. This is due to there being very little difference between the two films beyond the passage of time. Yes, Lindsay Lohan now finds herself in the adult role, but the film’s themes are very much the same. In the interest of fairness, I will admit that there is very little room for deviation given the film’s premise. This is a “walk a mile in another person’s shoes” type movie, and the film delivers on that, so when push comes to shove, the film delivered on what it was supposed to. However, I feel like this kind of movie was the reason that Disney created Disney+ for. As nice as it was to see Lohan return to the silver screen, this film marks Lindsay Lohan's first theatrically released leading role in 18 years. However, it just felt like the film would have been better suited on the streaming service. I will give this legacy sequel credit for its continuity, as it found a way to bring back nearly every character from the first film, which was something that I did not expect.
And when I say nearly every character, I mean nearly every character. Obviously, Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay had to return. It wouldn’t have been much of sequel without both of their participation. It was reportedly Jamie Lee Curtis who persuaded Lindsay Lohan to return to Disney again, as the two became close friends after the 2003 film. However, what was also interesting was the return of characters such as Chad Michael Murray (Jake), Mark Harmon (Ryan), Stephen Tobolowsky (Mr. Bates), Rosalind Chao (Pei-Pei), Lucille Soong (Pei-Pei's mom), Christina Vidal (Maddie), and Haley Hudson (Peg). Murray’s role offered some comic relief, as his character still carries a bit of a torch for Curtis’s character, but I think the return I was most surprised to see was Harmon, as this marked his first non-NCIS related work in 13 years. In addition to returning characters, the film also featured some returning music. If you will recall, Lohan’s character was in a band, and to the film’s credit, it found a way to incorporate some of those popular songs (Ultimate and Take Me Away) as well as a couple of original songs as well.
Posted in: The Reel World by Dakota Nivens on August 2nd, 2025
The Naked Gun (2025) is a beautifully absurd film that had me and everyone in the theater laughing in tears. It is both a continuation and reboot to the original franchise that introduces a new generation of characters, which still honors the classic formula of deadpan delivery, absurd plotlines, and visual gags that gave the original its significance. It was like a breath of fresh air in a lackluster era of Hollywood which felt seriously rich in soul. I can’t even joke; my face was hurting from laughing and smiling throughout the entire movie! Initially, I was apprehensive about the movie because it starred faces I’ve honestly grown tired of seeing in Hollywood, notably Neeson and Huston. It is a star-studded cast with Liam Neeson as Lt. Frank Drebin, Jr. and Pamela Anderson as Beth Davenport. Additionally, Seth MacFarlane is part of the production with Fuzzy Door Productions in partnership with Paramount Pictures. Even though I didn’t care for Neeson having the main role, his acting wasn’t washed up at all and was far better seeing him in a comedy—same with Huston. The production was ripe with cameos with Busta Rhymes as a bank robber, “Weird Al” Yankovic as himself, Cody Rhodes as a bartender, even ring announcer Bruce Buffer, and so many more. To me, this is what genuinely gave this movie its soul, with its cultural relevancy and space for diverse interests.
Even as a gay man, I have to say that Pamela Anderson was absolutely gorgeous and so sexy in this film! I say that because that is exactly how she set out to present herself as the femme fatale in this movie, and she nailed it! Even though her talks with the media around aging gracefully are viral, it felt she authentically elevated the Hollywood beauty standard that she so virtuously chooses to be buoyed by. She completely sold the dumb blonde trope, and the movie wouldn’t have had its charm without her!
Posted in: The Reel World by Brent Lorentson on August 1st, 2025
I have to admit it is hard to believe that Happy Gilmore came out nearly 30 yeas ago. It’s a hard pill to swallow, because I remember seeing it in the theater with my friends, and, well, that pretty much reminds me that I’m getting old. I’ve been a fan of Adam Sandler since his time on SNL, and it’s been interesting seeing how his career has grown. For me, I’ve remained a loyal fan not because I feel his films are great; honestly, he’s had quite a few duds along the way, but it’s because he seems to be one of the few guys in Hollywood who hasn’t changed with fame. You never hear about scandals. He just seems like a down-to-earth guy who really isn’t so different from his fans. When it comes to Happy Gilmore 2, this film has been something fans have been wanting for a while, though many of us just really didn’t think it was going to happen. After 30 years, was it worth the wait? Well, I’ll say this much: this film was certainly made for the fans.
Ever since Happy (Adam Sandler) won that gold jacket, he went on to have a successful career on the pro circuit. He ended up marrying Virginia (Julie Bowen), and they had five kids together. Everything seemed to be going great; that is, until an unfortunate accident occurred and Virginia was killedd and this sent Happy spiraling and becoming an alcoholic and giving up the sport. Oh, and grandma’s house that he fought so hard for in the first film -- he ends up losing that as well. It’s fair to say things are a bit darker for Happy this time around as we see him as a single dad struggling, and the one thing that seems to get him motivated is getting money together to send his daughter to a dance academy in France. As for Happy’s rival in the first film, Shooter McGavin, (Christopher McDonald), he’s been locked away in a mental institution since his breakdown after losing to Happy all those years ago. Another familiar face that returns is Hal (Ben Stiller); he’s no longer at the nursing home, but is in charge of Happy’s AA group. Honestly, this aspect was one of the weaker parts of the film, but Stiller still makes it work.
Posted in: The Reel World by Gino Sassani on July 26th, 2025
"I'm not giving up. We will face this together. We will fight it together... as a family."
In November of 1961 I wasn't quite five months old when Stan Lee and Jack Kirby created the first team of superheroes. Long before a Justice League or Avengers team was created, The Fantastic Four delivered a family of superheroes, and while it would be a few years before I would read my first issue, they created an impression along with Spider-Man, that has given me the love of comics and this kind of entertainment for the remainder of my life. The team first found themselves on film via a cheap Roger Corman film that was never released but found itself on the sci-fi convention circuit for decades. It was bad. Fox only made it so that they could keep the film rights a little longer, and they eventually made a couple of films, the first of which I consider underrated. We won't talk about the more recent film that became an historic bomb and cost its director a Star Wars film. Now Disney owns Fox, and it's time to bring The Fantastic Four and The X-Men into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU). Fantastic Four: First Steps kicks off the first film in Phase 6 of that MCU. I found the trailers a bit disturbing but went into the film with an open mind. This was, of course, the First Family of comics, and I very much want them to thrive.
Posted in: The Reel World by Brent Lorentson on July 26th, 2025
When it comes to video game adaptations, I learned a long time ago to not get my hopes up. Sure, there have been a few films that manage to do the source material justice, but for the most part the films tend to just fail in spectacular fashion. Until Dawn is honestly a game I never expected to see turn into a film or TV show, mostly because the game play is basically like a “choose your own adventure” style, and it just didn’t seem like something that could work. The approach the film takes is something different and takes the story into a Groundhog Day direction, only every time the characters re-spawn it becomes a different sub-genre of horror film. While I feel this is a terrible videogame adaptation, this actually turned out to be a fun premise for a film. So how does the film stand on its own? Well, a lot better than I had anticipated.
A group of friends have decided to tag along with Clover (Ella Rubin). She is on a trip to find out what happened to her missing sister. Along for the ride is her ex, Max (Michael Cimino) who still pines for her, her best friend, Nina (Odessa A’zion), and her boyfriend/ psychology major, Abe (Belmont Cameli). And then there is the oddball, fifth-wheel, Megan (Ji-young Yoo) who believes she has psychic abilities. The group has some decent chemistry, which helps this film a lot, because for the most part the film doesn’t waste time jumping into the creepy horror element. When the group stops off at a gas station, Clover encounters the gas station attendant (played by Peter Stormare) who drops some hints about people who have gone missing nearby. The gang follows up on this lead, and they find themselves at a unique little house that has a strange hourglass that mysteriously turns itself over and a guestbook that has Clover’s missing sister’s name scrawled inside.









