The Reel World

Very quirky, exciting to watch, and a sci-fi mystery you will not believe: that’s the film Nope. There have been many stories about flying saucers and invaders from space, but this wild and wacky production grabs you right from the beginning and never lets go. My kind of film; the pace is fast, and there’s never a dull moment. For years Otis Haywood, Sr. has been uneasy about happenings on his ranch.  His sudden death, however, has his sons OJ Haywood (Daniel Kaluuya) and Emerald Haywood (Keke Palmer) completely baffled. Their income has fizzled since their movie horses have been acting skittish on the sets, so OJ and Emerald want to get to the bottom of what has caused the recent disturbances at the ranch. One cloudy day, OJ sees a shiny object in the sky that he believes is an alien vessel. When it’s likely the reason for the turmoil, OJ and Emerald get set to challenge the mysterious invader. Jordan Peele does a terrific job of putting his film together, pacing it so the buildup to the finale becomes a modern-day war of the worlds. Not on the grand scale of films like Independence Day or even the movie War of the Worlds, this minimal film does it all in a rancher’s back yard.

What also makes the film good is the acting by Daniel Kaluuya and Keke Palmer, who run rampant as the unstoppable offspring.  Driven mad by the constant attacks, the two make a plan to prove what is happening on their ranch by turning it into a film.  But they chew off more than they can eat, or so their adversary thinks.

Some of my favorite films are those directed by Mel Brooks.  Blazing Saddles, Spaceballs, Young Frankenstein, The Producers, and the list goes on and on.  He has an ability to create a wonderful parody that blends comedy and homage to so many great films.  The films are those quite frankly that you can watch over and over again even if you have heard the joke fifty times in a row.  (I used to recite Spaceballs by heart until my college roommates at the time threatened to beat me to a bloody pulp)  So imagine my surprise when in the year 2022,  we get an animated film with Mel Brooks in one of the supporting voice roles, and it smells quite a bit like Blazing Saddles.  Let's take a look at Paws of Fury: The Legend of Hank.

Before we start this fine film, we are treated to a Big Nate short, since this is Nickelodeon and all.  I thought it was named How to Make Ice Cream, but it's actually named Bad Hamster, according to online sources.  It starts out with Nate and a few of his friends making an online video about how to make ice cream.  A few minutes later, I'm watching an awful dance number from a hamster who is singing "Don't Shove Me in Your Pocket"  while pooping out other hamsters.  I'm not kidding.  This is worse than "Frozen Fever", which was in front of the live-action Cinderella from 2015.

"I, like you, have heard the tall tales told about the Marsh Girl. An abandoned child. A little girl surviving on the marsh on her own, reviled and shunned." 

Where The Crawdads Sing took a rather unlikely journey to the big screen. It was the first novel from Delia Owens, who spent most of her life as a scientist focusing on Africa and coming up with some rather controversial theories. She went to Africa with her husband in 1996 and before long was embroiled in a situation where a documentary was shot that depicted the murder of a poacher. They left Africa facing murder charges, and now in her 70's Delia has tried her hand as an author of fiction. It shouldn't be too surprising that her maiden novel focused on a woman who was believed to be a killer. There's no question that some of her own life bled into the story, but in her 70's Delia Owens had a bestseller on her hands which was given more attention when Reese Witherspoon made the novel one of her book club selections, something Oprah was also able to do for many titles in her day. Witherspoon soon obtained the film rights of the film, and the result is a movie with a wonderful premise and set against some of the most beautiful locations in the southern United States. Add a pretty solid cast and you should have a great film. Something gets a little lost in the translation, but you do end up with a wonderfully atmospheric film that is likely to be a heavy contender for SEFCA's Gene Wyatt Award that goes to the film that best exemplifies the south. There's still a full six months to go, but it has the inside track right now for my vote.

“This is my vow. Death to all Gods.”

With this film, Hemsworth solidifies himself as having the most solo films of all the original Avengers. With Thor Love and Thunder, I’d say that his legacy has been assured and this film servers as a proper conclusion for the character. Circumstances suggest that this will not be the end for the character, but I cannot imagine a better conclusion than this one, so any continuations I fear would likely be subject to the law of diminishing returns. In reference to the film, It does not reach the heights that the Thor Ragnorak reached in my opinion. Even so, I found the film to still possess a majority of the qualities that made the franchise and the character beloved. Which is why I firmly feel there is no point in another installment. Better to go out on a win.

To date, I have probably seen each Despicable Me and Minions movie anywhere from half a dozen to a dozen times.  I blame most of this on my wonderful seven-year-old son, who thanks to this instant delivery of entertainment age has re-watched these movies at countless opportunities.  Naturally, my eyes glaze over at Gru, the Minions, and other supporting characters in between researching Blu-ray and 4K disc release dates.  But the truth is that it is one of the few movie series where I have went out of my way to make sure I had every 4K disc.  So, when we heard about a new movie of the little yellow guys, we were thrilled to say the least.  Eagerly, which was rare for us, we even decided to go on a Thursday night to our favorite theater (thank you Star Cinema Grill).  Let's see how it turns out.

Let's take it back to the 1970's.  We see a motorcycle running through the streets and the rider sporting a purple afro with the law giving chase.  She is able to duck into a record shop named Criminal Records.  Criminal Records is a front for the notorious group known as the Vicious 6.  The person on the bike is no other than Belle Bottom (voiced by Taraji P. Henson) who has stolen a map that will lead to a special necklace which contains a stone related to the Chinese zodiac.

Joe Hill has done a good job of establishing himself as a horror writer, and when you consider his dad, Stephen King, has been the “master” of horror fiction for over four decades, you’d have to imagine the expectations on Hill are pretty high. I’m a fan of Hill’s work, and I’ve enjoyed seeing his work translate to the big screen and television (though I’m still hoping one day we’ll finally get an adaption of his book Heart Shaped Box).  I’ll admit my expectations for The Black Phone were a bit high, and to be fair, can you blame me? The Black Phone would be a return to horror after director Scott Derrickson’s work on the first Doctor Strange film and a reunion with actor Ethan Hawke and screenwriter C. Robert Cargill from the great 2012 film Sinister.  I don’t think enough praise is given to the film Sinister. It’s a film that just gets better with time and has a high rewatch value. Personally I feel it’s the masterpiece in Derrickson’s filmography. The Black Phone has all the ingredients to be another modern classic, but it pains me to say it just doesn’t quiet deliver despite how much promise this film had.

It's 1978 in north Denver when the film kicks off, and the town is already under attack by “The Grabber” (Ethan Hawke). Parents and kids are terrified as kids have gone missing without a trace, and a bit of an urban myth has spread that if you talk about “The Grabber” that there is a good chance that you’ll be next. Finney (Mason Thames) and his sister Gwen (Madeleine McGraw) are dealing with a lot. Finney is dealing with bullies, while Gwen is tormented by dreams that may or may not be a psychic connection to the kidnappings. What’s more troubling for the brother and sister is their alcoholic father, who seems to have a hair trigger with his temper that results in punishing the kids with his belt. Jeremy Davies delivers a great performance in the first half of the film as the dad, so much so that the film didn’t need to even have the character of “The Grabber”. The tension on screen when the kids have to be careful with everything they say or do is anxiety-inducing enough, and some of these scenes are sure to get under the skin of some audience members. Finney and Gwen are characters we are rooting for. Their relationship is what works best in this film, and it is why when Finney is taken by “The Grabber”, the film loses some of its appeal.

“To infinity….”

Well, if you have ever wondered what the basis of the Buzz Lightyear action figure that Andy gets in the first Toy Story movie was, the wait is finally over. While it was briefly mentioned in the original film that the action figure was based a movie that the Andy character had seen, outside that mention, the character’s background remained predominantly a mystery … until now. Now with Lightyear, we finally know Buzz’s backstory. However, before we get into that, I believe that it is important to address the elephant in the room: the replacement of Tim Allen with Chris Evans. As expected, removing Allen as the voice of a character that he has been synonymous with since its inception, a character that he has played for nearly 25 years and across four films, was a bitter pill to swallow. On the surface, it would seem that Allen’s appearance was a repeat of what happened with his popular Fox television series, which was cancelled and eventually revived. However, according to the film’s director, Evans was always his first choice to voice the character for the origin story. He goes on to say that Allen’s version of the character was more comedic in nature given the context of the character, while this version balances Buzz’s comedic side with the seriousness and ambitiousness of the plot.

"Bigger. Why do they always have to go bigger?"

You don't really need me to answer that one, do you? What started with Jurassic Park in 1993 and even earlier with the blockbuster book by the late, great Michael Crichton has actually been 65 million years in the making. When an idea has been percolating for that long, you have to go bigger, or the audience will go home. Expectations take a bite out of your options, and by a sixth film you really have to come up with a game-stopper, so what do you do? You reinvent the franchise after two sequels failed to capture the magic and awe that was Jurassic Park. You let the idea sit for a decade or so, and then you bring it back with enough of the new and enough of the old to bring folks back into the theaters. And that's just how they did it with the Jurassic World trilogy. The first two films gave us a new cast of characters with the likes of Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard. A Jurassic Park has finally opened, and it's called Jurassic World. Someone decided a slight rebranding might be for the better. Jurassic World ends up suffering the fate the first film tried to warn them would happen. But by the end of the second Jurassic World film, we finally get what I felt I was promised a long time ago. The dinosaurs are no longer apart from the world on a secluded island where dinner has to be delivered, usually by helicopter or crashed plane. Now the dinosaurs are loose around the globe, and the dinosaurs finally get a wide variety of snacks with six billion menu choices.

It has been about 36 years since the release of the first Top Gun. This is one of my earliest memories as a kid, seeing the movie on the big screen with my parents at the old Main Street 6 Cinemas. I was a bit obsessed with this movie growing up. I had a copy of the film that I had recorded off of Showtime, and over the years I’d imagine I’ve seen Top Gun at least 100 times. I was obsessed with the movie and its soundtrack. Kenny Loggins and “Danger Zone” lived rent-free in my head throughout my childhood.  I know I’m not alone on this when saying just how much Top Gun is a movie I just love. It’s not perfect, but I just can’t find anything I dislike about it. Even in my forties, I look at this film as comfort food. It doesn’t matter the time or day, if it’s on, I can’t help but sit down and watch it. I’m putting this out there because, yeah, when I heard the talk of them first doing a sequel, I was excited, but I wasn’t too optimistic. Then when Tony Scott died in 2012, I thought for sure that was the nail in the coffin for any potential new Top Gun film. Ten years later, after over two years of delays, Top Gun: Maverick is finally hitting the big screen. After all these years and all the hype, is it worth the wait?

In case you haven’t realized it, Hollywood has been riding the wave of nostalgia for a while now. Just this week alone, Disney Pus is debuting the Obi-Wan Kenobi series, Netflix is releasing the new season of Stranger Things (that alone is borderline 80s nostalgia porn at its best), and then we have Top Gun: Maverick. This week is simply old-school pop-culture-on-steroids week, and a reminder of why it’s a good time to be alive as a cinephile. It’s important to keep all this in mind, because when you go in to the theaters to see Top Gun: Maverick, you are not just simply getting to see a new movie, but it’s also a nostalgic trip back to the first film that will leave you excited and at times maybe a little misty-eyed reuniting with these characters we first met so many years ago.

"You cannot control everything, Strange. You opened a doorway between universes, and we don't know who or what will walk through it."

The last time that director Sam Raimi played in the Marvel sandbox it was on the third of his own Spider-Man trilogy featuring Tobey Maguire in the webslinger's role. Since then he's kind of gone back to his horror roots and even returned to the Evil Dead franchise with a television series that continued the exploits of Bruce Williams as Ash. It's only fitting that he would see both of these worlds collide in a perfect storm that allows him to once again recreate that old 4-color universe on the big screen with both a connection to Spider-Man and his horror roots. The result is the latest MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) that picks up right where Spider-Man: No Way Home left off. Of course, I'm talking about Doctor Strange In The Multiverse Of Madness. The story pretty much picks up where we left things in the recent Spidey adventure as well as picking up some threads dropped on the Disney + shows, most notably Wanda Vision. It's a twisted nightmarish corner of the MCU that we haven't truly explored to this extent before and the results might not come close to the wonderful ride we took recently with our friendly neighborhood Spider-Man but it's a nice detour from the typical that also sets the stage for quite a few other surprises that I really won't be able to tell you about... at least not yet.