Disc Reviews

Despite the pandemic going on, 2020 managed to deliver when it came to the horror genre. The Invisible Man and The Dark and the Wicked were definitely some of the highlights, and then there was Freaky, a horror comedy that was delivering a twist on the body-swap story.  I’ll admit I was a little hesitant with embracing this idea, but when I saw it was being helmed by Christopher Landon, who brought us the Happy Death Day films; well, it gave me a little more confidence.  This is one of the few films that managed to get a theatrical release, but I’m still a bit hesitant on actually returning to the theaters.  Now that I’ve seen the film, I have to admit I’m a little bummed I didn’t get too see this with an audience. This is definitely one of those films that is a little more fun when you see it with an enthusiastic audience.  It’s pretty much Freaky Friday meets Friday the 13th, and, well, slashers always tend to play better with crowds.

From the opening sequence you pretty much know what you’re getting into.  It starts up like a very standard (clichéd even) situation with teenagers talking about a local serial killer and whether homecoming will be cancelled because of him.  How this sequence plays out reminded me of Scream, mostly in how it was self-aware and how that opening sequence with Drew Barrymore stands alone a well crafted cinematic slice of horror.  From the get-go, the humor is well mixed with some nicely done gore effects.  What’s slightly problematic, and what I feel some horror fans may take issue with, is that the film is very much a riff on the mainstream 90’s horror style.  It’s really my biggest issue, but I’m slightly more forgiving of this, because this is a style choice that’s obviously done in a tongue-in-cheek manner.  As a reminder, Vince Vaughn also played a serial killer in the 90’s when he took on the role of Norman Bates in the awful remake of Psycho.  Thankfully, just from the opening sequence alone, Vaughn redeems himself and actually plays a great menacing killer.

Come Play is the most recent film to be expanded to feature length following a successful short project. With the moderate success of Lights Out, it’s no big surprise that a studio would want to take a chance on Come Play, whose short film, “Larry”, worked as a prototype for the feature it would become.  This kind of thing happens quite often with genre projects, but sometimes you have to wonder is there really enough story to expand a 5-minute short into a 90-minute feature.  Using the addiction to technology and its ever-expanding AI features, there is plenty of story to be mined from this.  Recently there was the update to Child’s Play that had AI technology seeking a new best friend it would kill to have, and in that film, Chucky was able to manipulate the technology around him.  Come Play somewhat takes the same approach but instead creates a boogeyman for the age of modern tech. Then factor in that it’s a film under the Amblin umbrella, a company that is responsible for Poltergeist, ET, and numerous 80’s and 90’s genre classics … well, it’s hard to not have some raised expectations.

Oliver (Azhy Robertson) is a young boy who has autism. This has made his life at home and school rather challenging and has made it difficult for him to make friends.  At home he spends his time watching Spongebob on his phone while his parents fight.  It’s easy to feel for the young boy, and the performance Robertson delivers is quite impressive for his young age. Most importantly, though, from the start of the film these characters feel grounded, and the result makes for many intense moments.  It doesn’t take long for Oliver to find a children’s story that seems to just appear on his phone. The story talks about a creature that like Oliver is rejected by society and simply wants to find a friend.  The creature calls himself Larry, but though his intentions seem innocent enough, very quickly we discover he’s simply up to no good.  Then there is the struggling mother, Sarah (Gillian Jacobs). Despite all her efforts, she can’t seem to help her son, and her marriage is falling apart.  Her struggles with her son have even affected her friendships, so when her husband prepares to move out, she feels even more alone.

When it comes to the DC universe on television, I feel like Warner Bros. knows exactly what they are doing and truly understands the comics as well as their audience. Now that WB has merged with HBO, I was worried about whether some of the DC TV shows would continue on, since I’ve been impressed with the first two seasons of Titans and the first season of Doom Patrol.  I was even more curious about whether Doom Patrol could continue to deliver it’s WHAT THE F*** moments that were sprinkled throughout the first season. Now that I’ve come to the abrupt end that Season 2 delivered, I’m happy to say the show has managed to outdo itself.  One thing I want to get out of the way before I delve into this review: the season is only nine episodes long due to the pandemic, so the show does end with many story threads left wide open.

You think you’ve seen some weird and off-the-beaten-path shows? Well, Doom Patrol is without a doubt the most fun and unique show I’ve seen.  It makes Twin Peaks seem normal, and calling the show bonkers is putting it lightly.  Oh, and for those of you with young kids, you definitely may want to steer them clear of this show until you’ve seen what it offers. Where the first season delivered town-swallowing donkeys, asses with feet that can eat you, and talking streets, Season 2 steps up its oddball nature with sex ghosts and robots on ecstasy, and that is just a tiny glimpse at the oddball fun this show has in store for its audiences. I haven’t even gotten to some of the more absurd aspects of the show. But please don’t let this scare you off, because this motley crew of misfit superheroes are a hell of a good time to watch, and even more surprising is how lovable they all are.

"The door to destiny is always open, for those who are brave enough. Now shut the door before you let the heat out!"

Cartoons are now called animated features, and just like the comic books that provide the source material for these DC Universe animated features, they haven't been for children since the 1970's. The latest and 40th entry into this animated series is Batman: Soul Of The Dragon. It's rated R, which means some pretty rough language and a few surprisingly chilling scenes. So while the film itself will bring you back to the 1970's in so many ways, this is strictly a modern-day animated film inspired by more modern-day comics. Most of these features are based on established comic story arcs, but this one is completely original, even if it borrows heavily from many sources including more recent Batman adventures. If you are old enough to remember many of the iconic elements of the 70's, this film is for you. And that means you ain't no stinkin' child.

I’ll come out from the start and say how much I love the film Snowpiercer (2013). I was already a fan of Bong Joon Ho since I had seen The Host at a film festival, and I just thought his career would have exploded after the release of Snowpiercer. The tension created in that film as you see the tail section carefully move their way to the front of the train and the horrors they encounter along the way is engaging, and it speaks volumes.  The stories about cannibalism are heart-wrenching, and the violence is intense. You definitely feel the desperation and are rooting for the tail section from start to finish.  Sure, there was plenty of class warfare on display, but in the film it was very clear who was “good” and who was “bad”. Now we have a TV series inspired by both the graphic novels and the film, and this time those lines of good and bad are not so clear as it spins a new tale for us.  This isn’t simply a TV show version of the movie, which is something I’m thankful for, but instead this is another version of events that could have happened on this epic train that is essential to mankind’s survival.

The show kicks off with a brief introduction to the chaos as people attempted to board the train -- the savage cold that was taking the globe into its grasp, gunfire exploding at the station, and the immediacy to board as the doors were closing and the train was about to depart.  Because I’ve seen the movie and that took place 17 years after the train’s initial departure, I was looking forward to an origin story to see how sections were established and how the stowaways were handled.  Unfortunately we don’t get to see that here either, and I’m a bit disappointed by that.  This time around the show starts off seven years from departure, and the divide in classes has already been established. The first episode throws so much at the viewer that a scene where you witness a passenger take their own life just sort of loses its impact. What disappointed me most is that the show starts off as a bland murder mystery, where a body is found mutilated and the only one who can solve the crime is a former homicide detective who resides in the back of the train.

“You will survive Christmas in the mountains. I promise”

Someone should have told that character about making promises that you can’t keep. In this horror film, which felt more like a dark comedy if you ask me, a newly formed blended family and their au pair find themselves doing battle with a group of evil toys. That’s right, you read correctly, I said toys, and on Christmas no less. Now, the premise of evil toys is nothing new. I for one still can’t look at a Chucky doll without internal feelings of dread; however, where those films were able to instill fear, Toys of Terror just doesn’t do it, largely due to the film’s overall pacing. It just takes too long to get off the ground. Plenty of sizzle, but by the time we get to the steak, much of the runtime has been depleted and all the intrigue has bubbled out. While it is not the horror film that I expected, there were still some elements of the film that were worthwhile despite a bit of a lackluster conclusion.

I was very much impressed with the quality of this film. Of late the quality of horror films that I’ve reviewed have not been great, and this film helped to restore my faith in the genre. While I am past the era of these types of movies scaring the bejesus out of me, I still admire a creative story that isn’t completely predictable. There are some elements of the film that were somewhat predictable, but overall the premise and story quality kept the project from being stale. The film reminds me of what Terrence Howard said in Four Brothers: “Keep knocking on the Devil’s door long enough and sooner or later someone’s going to answer you.” Great line and sound advice, which this film appears to expand upon. While the film is probably still falls into the B- movie category, the production quality and diligent work of the cast ensures that it falls into the higher spectrum of the B-movie category. The film features Ryan Guzman (television series 9-1-1) as a priest specializing in exorcism for his many followers on social media. As you can probably guess, he is far from the real deal and looking to catapult his little production into a massive following and huge payday, when he comes face to face with a real deal demon and he has to actually practice what he’s been pretending to preach. Rounding out the cast is Kyle Gallner, another television fixture best known for his performances on Veronica Mars and Smallville.

The film opens up right in the action, as Father Max (Guzman) works tirelessly to free an innocent man possessed by a demon. After a momentous struggle, the man is freed in front of an audience of thousands on social media. Then it’s revealed that the entire ordeal was fake and that Max is not a real priest, but an actor hoping to tap into a niche market. The whole setup is the brainchild of Max and his childhood best friend Drew, in order to make a profit. Drew is hoping to expand their enterprise, while Max is merely hoping to grow his own hype. It is abundantly clear that Max is more self-serving than Drew, who has unwavering loyalty to Max for reasons that become clear later in the film.

The Twilight Zone is simply one of those pop culture staples that everyone knows about even if they’ve never seen a single episode. Because of SYFY channel I’ve gotten to see the original show as well as the reboots that would follow. While I’m not as passionate about the anthology series as others, I certainly can appreciate its impact on the not just the sci-fi/horror genre but the history it’s had on television as well. I was curious about this new incarnation of The Twilight Zone, but I was less than enthusiastic about Jordan Peele being involved with the show.  As much as I’m a fan of Key & Peele, his foray into horror and sci-fi has left me more than underwhelmed. Being a fan of anthologies and with a little bit of curiosity, I went into Season 2 of The Twilight Zone with an open mind, and the result is a bit of a mixed bag.

My biggest complaint has more to do with the overall visual style of the show. I’m really not liking the desaturated look for every episode, but what’s more frustrating is the show’s overuse of negative space in the frame. It’s obviously a conscious decision to have so many shots with so much head space or the focus of attention on a third of the screen. Sometimes it works for the scene, but a majority of the time it just looks like pretentious garbage. If it seems like I’m being harsh, well, I’m glad, because cinematography 101 should be: understand the value of focusing on the subject. Sure, many other directors and camera ops can get away with this, but it’s not something that should be used all the time.

Well despite being typecasted, Liam Neeson delivers an entertaining film with Honest Thief. The film depicts the story of a prolific bank robber who after falling in love, decides to turn himself in exchange for a reduced sentence. A caveat of this deal is that he must also return the money he stole; all nine million dollars of it. It isn’t hard to figure out where the story goes from here. Naturally, the FBI agents assigned to the case immediately get greedy upon seeing the money and make plans to keep it for themselves. Where the film deviates is when they agents try to kill him, they are caught by their boss and forced to kill him and frame Neeson for the crime. I was prepared for the greed, but not the murder of one of their own, so that provided a decent twist, or it would have had it not been one of the big selling twist featured in all the promotional trailers for the film. Sometimes Hollywood ruins a good twist by providing too much information in the trailer. Rounding out the cast is Kate Walsh, Jai Courtney, Robert Patrick, and one of my favorite actors, Jeffrey Donovan.

To briefly summarize again, the film follows former Marine and demolition expert Tom Dolan (Neeson), a master thief whose precision and dedication to his craft has earned him the moniker, the “In-and-Out Bandit.” For years, he has operated without detection and even the threat of being caught until he meets Annie (Walsh), a recently divorced grad student who he falls head over heels for. Wanting to spend the rest of his life with her without the risk of future imprisonment looming over his head; Dolan stops robbing banks and contacts the FBI to make a deal to turn himself in and the money in exchange for a reduced sentence.

When I first saw The Strangers, I have to admit I was pleasantly surprised by how much that movie stuck with me.  Sure, there have been plenty of home invasion flicks over the years, but The Strangers is definitely right up there with the best like Funny Games and Inside.  Writer and director Bryan Bertino is one of modern horror’s underappreciated creators. He is so good at keeping things simple, utilizing small casts and single settings, and keeping the horror relatively grounded in reality.  With The Dark and The Wicked, he gives us his best work to date, and for me one of the best horror films in years. Personally, this is my favorite new horror release since 2016’s The Autopsy of Jane Doe.  I’m sure plenty of people will disagree with me, and for as much love as I have for Hereditary, what The Dark and The Wicked did that honestly very few horror films manage to do is genuinely get under my skin.  This movie actually creeped me out, and it didn’t use big gory FX or go for cheap jump scares. This literally is a master class in creating tension and delivering a story to audiences that starts off in familiar territory but takes us in new and fresh directions.

“You shouldn’t have come here.”