This grouping from Film Movement has been my favorite to date. The theme that ties these films together is what I would label as “art as process.” Each film revolves around the philosophies of making, practicing, refining, and reflecting upon one’s own art. Featuring one narrative and two documentaries, this grouping really foregrounds the importance of the messiness when it comes to process. In order to be a true artist, a true expert in your craft, you can’t be afraid to get messy: to fail before persevering. My Art, The Paris Opera, and Conduct! Every Move Counts each share an appreciation for failure and the seeds of success it plants within aspiring artists, both young and old.

First in the lineup, My Art, is a love letter to the cinema and the overall process of art. Written, directed, and starring Laurie Simmons, the film feels somewhat autobiographical. Perhaps the character, Ellie (played by Simmons), may not be an exact replica of Simmons, but their likeness in age and the film’s message of struggling to maintain relevance in an art scene offer what I would like to consider a personal touch. The way in which Ellie refines her work is by recreating classic films that star herself and two other actors nearing her age, with an old video camera. While I didn’t really fall in love with the film given its pacing, I couldn’t stop thinking about the implications that Simmons puts forward with this simple narrative: the naïve exploration of “new art” through an unconscious use of aging media. For example, Ellie is an elderly woman recreating films that inspired her to become an artist when she was young, but now she returns to that nostalgic feeling with older “new” technology in order to record it (digital video has largely replaced film in many cases, but the digital video camera she is using is old and struggling to find its place, just like her character). So much of the film plays upon this tension that it propels the audience through the pockets of narrative that seem to lag.

The film is based on a series of books that I had never read, and from what I understand the film takes many liberties with the storyline and characters. As his sophomore effort behind the camera, there were high expectations for what Garland would do, and the result I believe is one of the most divisive films I’ve seen in a while. This is the kind of film that gets me excited for the future of cinema, not just because I loved the film, but I love the conversation it can provoke with other filmgoers.

The film has a non-linear narrative; really, this is my only complaint, since it opens virtually where our story is nearing its end. While I usually don’t have a problem with this kind of storytelling, I’m annoyed by it this time around, because all the suspense around the survival of our lead is stripped away. The film still manages to squeeze in some head-spinning surprises at the end, so I can easily put my one measly complaint aside.

If you've visited this website at any point this century, you know the name Gino Sassani. Gino is the senior editor/fearless leader of Upcomingdiscs.com and an award-winning recording artist for Omega Records currently working on his 8th album. Please join us in congratulating him on his latest accolade: Gino was recently voted into the Southeastern Film Critics Association (SEFCA).

SEFCA members publish their work or live in Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. Gino began reviewing films in the early 1990s as a segment of his local television show, “Focus.” Working out of his home theater, which is affectionately known as “The Reel World,” Gino has written over 3,000(!) reviews since he joined the site in 2000. Gino has had the honor of chatting with a diverse group of industry giants — ranging from Joe Dante to Ice Cube — and has posted the interviews, along with dozens of others, as podcasts on the site.

So Negative excellently exemplifies the importance of respecting a person privacy as our main character finds himself inadvertently drawn into a world of spies and drug cartel all thanks to the act of snapping a simple photo. Katia Winter and Simon Quarterman star as this duo thrown together and forced to rely on one another to survive. This thriller takes a minute to build traction, but still manages to entertain. However, winter tends to be very monotone and soft-spoken, so you will need to have to volume up to catch some of her dialogue.

All he did was take her picture. This seemingly innocent act, brings Hollis (Simon Quarterman) more grief then could have ever imagined, as later that night the subject of his intrigue shows up at his apartment. Her name is Natalie (Katia Winter) and she is a former MI-5 operative in the process of going into hiding, and she can’t afford to have photographic evidence of her presence floating around. She merely went to retrieve the proof, she anticipated she would have to be a bit forceful to get it back. However, she did not expect the people hunting her to locate her so quickly.

"A long time ago in a galaxy far far away..."

Yes, those lines open this Star Wars story, because the filmmakers want to be sure you know what you're watching. This is Star Wars. Just in case there was anyone at all in the audience who had no idea they just bought a ticket to Star Wars. If he were dead, George Lucas would be rolling over in his grave. Instead, maybe he's just having some restless nights with little sleep. It is Star Wars. And that means there will be a droid as a main character, space battles, and some good old fashioned one-reel-serial-days adventure. It's a heck of a visual amusement park ride, and the film will certainly entertain. But I have to open by saying it is my least favorite of the Disney Star Wars films to date.

“I find giants…I hunt giants…I kill giants”

This is one of those films that for some reason didn’t find an audience during a theatrical run, but I can guarantee there are viewers who are going to connect with this film and embrace it for years to come.  I say this because only a few years ago there was a film that was similar in tone, A Monster Calls, and to be honest, that film devastated me as we went along with the main character as he and his imaginary monster helped him cope with his mother who is dying from cancer.  I Kill Giants is at face value the same film, only told through the eyes of a young girl, though despite the films being so similar, it doesn’t lessen the film’s overall impact in the least. Sometimes a good story simply works. No matter how much you may dress it up, its emotional impact can remain the same.

I’m going to pretty much start this off by saying The Manor is pretty much the horror equivalent of The Room.  When I write this I’m not sure if the comparison is a compliment or not, whether the film was intended to be this bad or not.  It’s possible to do a film that is so bad it’s good, this goes way back to the Ed Wood era with some B-movie classics and later on in years we got Troma films. Though despite many of these films later becoming fodder for Mystery Science Theater, there was still a level of quality or charm to them that made them watchable (usually in the late night hours when viewers are too drunk or stoned to care about what they were watching).  This brings me back to The Manor where I’m left questioning their intentions. Is this a film made to garner the same success that we’ve seen from The Room or is this film just bad?

When we first meet Amy (Christina Robinson) she is having herself checked out from a mental ward after being there for a few years.  Now that Amy is 18 and being released into the care of her mother, the plan is to simply reacquaint her with the family.  While the family is getting together at Anders Manor there are a few more oddball guests that are staying for a visit as well.  Between a trio of hillbilly hunters, one of which seems to be a generic leather clad Steven Seagal impersonator, then there is a religious group called the True Believers and their leader is played by Kevin Nash.  Mix in some cotton candy, incest talk and some booze the film only continues to get stranger.

As with Vol. 4 of Film Movement’s Festival Picks, this grouping of films is tied together by a very specific theme: estranged father figures. On the whole, this set of films has a much better pacing than its preceding volume, but it is not without pockets of slow-moving story. However, I feel that there is something naturally compelling about an estranged family member within a narrative, as it provides a conflict that seems to write itself. The most interesting aspect of this collection is the different ways in which each relationship is reconciled. In Jermal, the relationship between father and son is repaired through hardships. In The Girl in Yellow Boots, the relationship is rekindled negatively. And in Entre Nos, the relationship is abandoned.

The Girl in Yellow Boots is strange, as it has the most intense narrative, but also it the slowest pace of the three films. It is a character study about a young woman who moves to India to find her father. While the titular yellow boots don’t really factor into the plot of the film too much (she wears them at the beginning, but they largely become inconsequential), her profession as a massage therapist and the relationships she develops with her clients are the crucial elements of the film. While the film does sport a slow pace, it has the heaviest, or “messed up,” climax of the three films, in terms of reconciling with her father.

"Just another American who saw too many movies as a child? Another orphan of a bankrupt culture who thinks he's John Wayne? Rambo? Marshall Dillon?"

So the great debate rages on. Is Die Hard a Christmas movie or just a movie that happens to be set at Christmastime? Recently Stephen Amell from Arrow told a press group that his favorite Christmas movie was indeed Die Hard. He's not alone there. I've had the debate a few times myself. Unfortunately, I come down on the side that Die Hard is not a Christmas movie. Here's my criteria. Does Christmas play a vital part in the plot of the movie? The truth is that Die Hard could have happened at any time, as the many sequels have demonstrated over the years. Fox obviously doesn't think of it as a Christmas film. Why? Because they've waited until summer to release the film on UHD Blu-ray in glorious 4K. They could have released it for the shopping season or even held it for next shopping season. Either way, be glad it's not a Christmas movie, because it's May, and the film is out now in 4K. Grab it up and enjoy Christmas in May, if that's your thing.

“Don’t give them all of you, Dominika. Hold something back. That is how you will survive.”

There appears to be nothing Jennifer Lawrence can’t do. She is an Oscar winner, the face of a successful movie franchise, and now she is a Russian spy who specializes in seduction techniques. Now in the looks department, there are scores of men that would gladly hand over their social security number for the opportunity to be seduced by J Law, so her casting was a no-brainer. But she went much deeper than that, showing an unparalleled intellect and natural aptitude for the world of espionage.